${site.data.firmName}${SEMFirmNameAlt}

Let Us Start Working On Your Solution

Schedule A Consultation

818-676-9605

California Divorce - A Brief Overview

Divorce in dictionary

DATE OF SEPARATION IN DIVORCE ACTIONS: THE OLDEN DAYS, PROGRESSION, AND THE CURRENT VIEW FROM THE BENCH

The Olden Days"Evidence showed that there was no final parting of the ways or intention not to resume marital relations under the same roof until such time as wife refused to permit husband's return to their home"-Legislature adopted the Civil Code in 1872.

Progression


"The question is whether the parties' conduct evidences a complete and final break in the marital relationship". Marriage of Baragry (1977)

"The court held that "legal separation requires not only a parting of the ways with no present intention of resuming marital relations, but also, more importantly, conduct evidencing a complete and final break in the marital relationship". Marriage of von der Nuell (1994)

Current View From The Bench


In our view, the language in these cases-requiring consideration of " all of the relevant evidence" regarding " 'whether the parties' conduct evidences a complete and final break in the marital relationship' " (Umphrey, Baragry), requiring both a lack of "present intention of resuming marital relations ... [and] conduct evidencing a complete and final break in the marital relationship" (von der Nuell), and indicating that "[a]ll factors ... are to be considered" in deciding the " ultimate question" of "whether either or both of the parties perceived the rift in their relationship as final" (Hardin)-must be understood in the context of their facts, which reflect that in each case the parties had moved into separate places of residence. These cases do not address, and therefore are not authority for a conclusion that "living separate and apart" was intended by the Legislature, originally or subsequently, to require, as wife argues, only demonstrated conduct reflecting a subjective intent to part ways with no plan of resuming the marital relationship, which might, but need not necessarily, include physical separation. (Cornejo)

We conclude that living in separate residences "is an indispensable threshold requirement for a finding that spouses are living separate and apart". This interpretation of the statutory language aligns with the common under-standing of the words, the statutory history of the provision, and legitimate public policy concerns.

Shulman Family Law Group

Maya Shulman, Esq.

SFLG

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Email Us For a Response

Contact The Firm

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Contact

24025 Park Sorrento
Suite 310
Calabasas, CA 91302

Toll Free: 800-230-1770
Phone: 818-676-9605
Fax: (818) 222-0010
Calabasas Law Office Map

7 W. Figueroa Street
Suite 300
Santa Barbara, CA 93101

Toll Free: 800-230-1770
Phone: 818-676-9605
Fax: (818) 222-0010
Map & Directions

Review Us